How to Create an Engaging MOOC
It can be difficult for some to tell the difference between an online course and a MOOC - a Massive Online Open Course - but there are differences. Primarily these differences fall into two issues: audience and access. Often an online course, if created by an institution is meant primarily for students and there is some kind of access barrier; like requiring a institution login. If the course is not made by an institution the difference is more likely to be related to payment. Access to a MOOC requires no payment (although some may debate this). Sometimes, you will find that MOOCs will allow you to audit a course for free (consume the information) but if you want the certificate of completion, you will need to pay for that. This post is aimed at helping those who would want to create a MOOC for their subject. Definition of MOOC A MOOC is an acronym for a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) and this means (is, by definition) that they are: Online courses accessible with computer and internet connection Accessible barrier-free (no need to wait to be accepted by an institution, no pre-requisites, no fees, etc.) Open to anyone (the numbers are not capped) 8 Main Considerations for Creating a MOOC There are a lot of different decisions that need to be made before the first paragraph of your course is made but do not let that stop you from pursuing creating a MOOC if you really believe that it is something that the audience wants and needs. MOOCs are very good at being an introduction to a specific topic that may lead learners to deeper investigations into the topics they cover. 1. Audience Determining who the audiences are for your MOOC is one of the first decisions you need to make. This will determine how you write it, the visuals you use, the interaction that might be wanted, what kind of assessments you need, etc. During our research, we found that the audiences of MOOCs have shifted over the past decade - away from the education market to professional learners looking to achieve professional and career growth. This is because of the need to constantly adapt to the changing job market. Once you have determined your audience(s), make sure to begin to think about marketing. How does your audience want to learn about this course? Doing research into how they use social media, how they usually consume (online) courses, where they “gather” is so important for your course to actually have an impact. 2. Platform There are many platforms out there but most of them have been developed by engineers centered around functionalities rather than the needs of the users’ experiences. Many of these platforms have settled into a very familiar setup - left hand accordion navigation with text, videos, or photos in the centre-right position. The open-source platform that was utilised for the Service Design Sprint MOOC and it has been created and is developed in the University of Helsinki. This makes the platform local and meets many of the requirements surrounding data processing which can be problematic with some of the other, even more popular, platforms. The learning curve for this platform is quite reasonable and it is quite adaptable. 3. Content Writing in a tone that you would like to be taught in and that the content requires is important. One of your first content decisions will require you to decide if you will include videos or not. Some courses are just text based like the Service Design Sprint course is. Others determine that video should be the delivery method. If you decide to create videos you will need to determine how they will be produced and, if there are updates in the future, how you will update them. For us one of our decisions was that having a text-based course would be easier in the long run to update and iterate when needed. Video, while undoubtedly more engaging, involved many people and many skills when an update or an iteration on the content needs to happen. Another decision that you will need to make for the content is how academically rigorous will it be and adjacent to that, how will you use references/cites in the course. You will always want to make an accurate and factual course but you also need to balance that with the experience the user has. This means readability, understandability, clarity, etc. This again will depend on the audience that you defined earlier. If people will primarily use the course as a stepping stone to the next level, then it is important to reference well and thoroughly but if your goal is to have people understand the topic and implement the learnings fairly immediately, academic referencing can be done in a less distracting way so as not to interrupt the flow of learning. 4. Accessibility Accessibility can be seen from different perspectives, from a disability perspective, to a timing issue, to where it exists online. Accessibility in terms of being useable by all is another big decision and may need an additional specialist that can help design for accessibility. A good UX/UI designer will know how to make the course better accessible to everyone. The timing of the course is an early decision you need to make and there are two choices: the course will open and close on certain dates or it will be continuously open. This impacts how people find and do your course. And finally, where your course will live online. This depends on the platform that you choose and will determine if you have direct access to update your course or if you need help from the platform to make those changes. 5. Visual identity Visuals are an important part of a course. As mentioned, the course we created was text based and while this was a deliberate decision, it also meant that we needed to really consider the visual element we wanted to add. The balance we needed to keep was one of engaging but not distracting. Visuals that added to the content but that did not take away from it. The human brain “processes visual content 60,000 times faster than text”1. This is why visual elements help process the information and can also be a distraction. It is very important that any visuals used reflect the concepts that you are trying to communicate in your content. Otherwise, the student may wonder how it relates and think that they are not understanding properly. This becomes a huge distraction. 6. Interaction Will the students interact with a lecturer? Will the student interact with each other? If they interact with each other, will this course be done in cohorts? There are many questions to answer in terms of interaction as this will determine how much time it will take to administer at any given time. For peer-to-peer interaction, it often requires a 3rd party platform to add that functionality. So you need to see what options the platform that you are using - whether this is built-in or if it requires you to connect the two systems somehow. This functionality would also require moderation and interaction by the lecturer as it is likely that there will be questions that cannot always be answered peer-to-peer. For student/lecturer interaction, including certain kinds of assessments (see below), this is also a discussion that needs to be had with the platform provider. 7. Credits For institutions in Finland, recording credits is an important funding consideration. Credits are also important for any students who wish to take the course. But not all participants in a MOOC will need credits. What they might all want is a certificate of completion. For some, this is recognition enough. But your user research will tell you what your audience would like and need. For a MOOC, students (whether at your institution or another Finnish institution) are not necessarily the main audience for a MOOC. This makes credits not as clear cut a decision. There will be some set up time for creating pathways to obtain credits but if you know the process, it isn’t too difficult. 8. Assessment The assessment will be determined by the audience you are serving. It will also depend on the platform that you have chosen. There will be limitations in each platform to the types of assessment that you can do. One of the bigger decisions that you need to make is whether you want students to submit text responses for assessment. The outcome of open text is that there will need to be someone who reads, assesses, and returns those. It may also be possible to set up a separate assessment process for those who want to take the course for credits or if you want to include the MOOC inside another course that you are teaching. Since not all people will want or need actual ECTS credits, requiring them to participate in more rigorous assessment may be a deterrent to their participation. This is just something to keep in mind as you make these decisions. Creating Metropolia's Next MOOC These 8 guidelines were the outcome of the most recent MOOC created at Metropolia - Service Design Sprint (in English) or Palvelumuotoilun sprint (in English) - with a Ukrainian version under development. The creation of this MOOC was part of the project that saw funding become available because of Helsinki Region’s designation as a European Entrepreneurial Region (EER) through Uudenmaanliito 2021-2023. From Metropolia’s perspective, it aimed to create access to knowledge about modern business development to local small and middle-sized entrepreneurs (SMEs) in the post-covid recovery period. But we can take the lessons learned from this project and create a collection of MOOCs on various subjects at Metropolia. By making your course more accessible and relatable, both content-wise and visually, more people will complete your course and be inclined to pursue the topic more. Impact like this is what all course creators are looking for. It is the kind of learning that will help RDI teams to spread their knowledge to the surrounding society and possibly have an impact even beyond. Author Pamela Spokes works as a Service Designer in Metropolia’s RDI team. Originally from Canada, Pamela has years of experience in university admin focusing on international recruitment, marketing, and the international student/staff experience. With a Bachelor’s from Canada, a Master’s degree from Sweden, an MBA in Service Innovation & Design from Laurea, and her AmO from Haaga-Helia, she is interested in purposefully designed experiences that are centred around the user. Don’t be surprised if she knocks on your door to talk about learning co-creation methods through intensive learning experiences. Source Thermopylae Sciences & Technology 2014: Humans process visual data better (t-sciences.com)
Edelläkävijäorganisaatioissa keskitytään toimivan oppimiskulttuurin luomiseen
Toimintaympäristön nopeiden muutosten ja aiempaa suuremman ennakoimattomuuden myötä yritysten tulee kiinnittää huomiota yhä systemaattisemmin osaamisen kehittämiseen ja mahdollistaa työpaikalla tapahtuva ketterä jatkuva oppiminen. Systeemisessä toimintaympäristössä tarvitaan nykyistä monimuotoisempaa ja yhteisöllisempää tietoa, jonka avulla pystymme hahmottamaan viheliäisten ongelmien keskinäisriippuvuuksia ja eri asioiden välisiä yhteyksiä (1). Ongelmia ei ratkota enää yksin. Organisaatioiden kehittyminen tapahtuu enenevässä määrin verkostoissa ja kompleksissa ympäristöissä, eikä välttämättä enää rakennukaan täysin yksilöiden ominaisuuksien varaan. (2). Osaamista, tietoa ja kokemuksia jakamalla syntyy ratkaisuja Käytäntöyhteisöt ovat yksi esimerkki verkostosta, jossa opitaan. Tunnusomaista niille on se, että yhteisöön kuuluvia ihmisiä yhdistää kiinnostus ilmiöön, jonka äärellä he työskentelevät ja ratkaisevat kompleksisia ongelmia. Yhteisön keskuudessa jaetaan tietoa, materiaaleja, kokemuksia sekä yleisesti omaa osaamista aiheesta. Käytäntöyhteisöllä ei välttämättä ole yhteisesti jaettua päämäärää tai toimeksiantoa. Yksilöt kokevat yhteisön merkitykselliseksi siksi, että se kokoaa samasta aiheesta kiinnostuneita ihmisiä yhteen ja auttaa oppimaan merkityksellisiä asioita omien työtehtävien tai intressien näkökulmasta. (3) Parhaimmillaan käytäntöyhteisö luo yhteisesti jaettua käsitystä ongelmista ja niiden ratkaisuista ja tukee näin yhteisten organisaatiotavoitteiden saavuttamista. Modernissa organisaatiossa oppiminen ei välttämättä olekaan niin suoraviivaisesti johdettavissa. Tärkeämpää on luoda edellytyksiä sille, että työntekijät ovat vuorovaikutuksessa toistensa kanssa, jakavat omaa osaamistaan ja hiljaista tietoa yhdessä tekemisen, keskustelujen sekä reflektion kautta. Opitut asiat ja uudet ratkaisut integroidaan organisaation rakenteisiin toimintamalleiksi, joiden kautta poisopitaan vanhasta ja sovelletaan uutta osaamista. (4) Tämän lisäksi, yritykset ja työntekijät hyötyvät myös siitä, että ne liittyvät osaksi ekosysteemejä. Niiden kautta yritykset voivat löytää aiempaa vaikuttavampia toimintatapoja ja puuttuvaa osaamista monimutkaisten ja liiketoiminnan kannalta oleellisten ongelmien ratkaisemiseen. (5) Edelläkävijäorganisaatioissa ei keskitytä enää vain kompetenssien johtamiseen vaan huomiota kiinnitetään toimivan oppimiskulttuurin ja -käytänteiden sekä verkostojen luomiseen (6). Verkostoituminen, ideoiden ristiinpölyttäminen ja reflektointi ei ole suoraviivainen prosessi. Siksi yritysten tulee uskaltaa antaa henkilöstölle aikaa ja lupa uuden oppimiselle. Opitaan arjessa –toimintamalli auttaa yrityksiä luomaan oppimista tukevan toimintakulttuurin Verkostoitumista ja yhteistä tiedon rakentelua voi edistää ja mahdollistaa erilaisten toimintamallien ja yhteiskehittämistä tukevien teknologioiden avulla. On tärkeää luoda toimintakulttuuria, jossa kysyminen, avun pyytäminen ja epäonnistuminenkin on sallittua. Turvallisessa ilmapiirissä ihmiset uskaltavat jakaa keskeneräisiäkin ajatuksia ja toisaalta haastaa rakentavalla tavalla toinen toistensa ideoita. Usein tämän kaltaiset rakenteet ja toimintakulttuuri ruokkivat työntekijöiden halua oppia uutta ja osallistua yrityksen yhteisten tavoitteiden saavuttamiseen. (7) Metropolia on yhteistyössä kumppaneidensa kanssa kehittänyt työssä oppimiseen “Opitaan Arjessa -toimintamallin”. Sen tavoitteena on edistää tiimien oppimista työn arjessa sekä käynnistää yrityksen oppimista tukevan toimintakulttuurin kehittymisen. Toimintamallissa tiimi nostaa itse omasta työstään ajankohtaisen kehityskohteen ja sen ratkaiseminen muodostaa oppimispolun. Tukemalla koko tiimin oppimista lisätään sekä yksilöiden että työyhteisön osaamista. Yksilöisen ja työyhteisön osaamisen kasvattamisen lisäksi Opitaan Arjessa –mallin prosessi vahvistaa tiimien yhteisöllisyyttä ja yhteistyön sujuvuutta, osaamisen jakamisen kulttuuria ja työn merkityksellisyyttä. Työyhteisöjen ja tiimien muutosmatkaa tukevat Metropolia ammattikorkeakoulun asiantuntijat, jotka sparraavat ja fasilitoivat työn arjessa tapahtuvaa oppimisprosessia. He voivat tuoda Opitaan arjessa –mallin valmennuksen osaksi myös korkeakoulussa tuotettavaa uutta tieteellistä ja substanssitason näkökulmaa ja sisältöä. Toimintamallin prosessiin osallistuvia työntekijöitä voidaan palkita korkeakoulun myöntämillä osaamismerkeillä ja opintopisteillä. Toimintamalli on sovellettavissa eri kokoisissa ja eri toimialojen yrityksissä. Kirjoittajat Kati Marin toimii jatkuvan oppimisen asiantuntijana ja kehittäjänä. Hän on koulutukseltaan kasvatustieteen maisteri ja kohta valmis tradenomi (YAMK). Työssään hän kehittää erilaisia uusia oppimispalveluita, jotka vastaavat työelämän ja sitä kautta ihmisten muuttuviin osaamistarpeisiin. Uudet oivallukset syntyvät yhdessä tekemisen ja erilaisten ajatusten ristiinpölyttämisen kautta. Tutustu Katin LinkedIn-profiiliin. Irina Tikka toimii osaamisen kehittämisen asiantuntijana Oppimisen verkostot ja palvelut -tiimissä. Hän tunnistaa oppimistarpeita ja kehittää oppimisratkaisuja Metropolian kumppaneille. Aiemmin hän on toiminut Metropoliassa muun muassa kansainvälistymisen, opetuksen suunnittelun ja liiketoiminnan kehittämisen tehtävissä. Koulutukseltaan hän on tradenomi (YAMK) ja kohta ammatillinen opettaja. Hänen intohimona on tukea muita menestymään osaamisen vahvistamisen, oppimisen ja oivaltamisen avulla. Tutustu Irinan LinkedIn-profiiliin. Lähteet Joutsenvirta, M. (2022). Miten opitaan tulevaisuudesta käsin? Julkaisussa Työn tuuli. Kyvykkyyden johtaminen organisaation menestystekijäksi. (PDF) Viitattu 12.5.2023. Ryky, P. (2022). Oppimisen johtaminen : Teoreettinen katsaus klassikoihin ja uudempiin malleihin. (PDF) TYÖ2030 - Työn ja työhyvinvoinnin kehittämisohjelma. Viitattu 12.5.2023. Wenger, E. (2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. (PDF) Ivey business journal, 68(3), 1-8. Viitattu 12.5.2023. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. (PDF) California management review, 40(3), 40-54. Viitattu 12.5.2023. Arola, M., Huttula, T., Jämsén, P., Kirjavainen, A., Mustikainen, H., Ranki, S., Santamäki, I., Vesa, A.-M. & Villanen, J. (2022). Tulevaisuuden osaaminen syntyy ekosysteemeissä. Uuden osaamisjärjestelmän kuvaus. (sitra.fi) Viitattu 12.5.2023. Mukamas (2019). Vaietaanko vai voitetaanko? Viisi jatkuvan työssäoppimisen edellytystä. (mukamas.fi) Viitattu 12.5.2023. Siikanen, R. & Härkin, J. (2022). Develop and maintain strategy-driven learning culture. Learning Built With a Purpose to Engage Learniners. (PDF) Viitattu 12.5.2023. -- Jos olet kiinnostunut ottamaan mallin avulla ensimmäiset askeleet kohti oppivan organisaation luomista, ota yhteyttä Irina Tikkaan (irina.tikka@metropolia.fi). Luodaan yhdessä toimivia oppivia organisaatioita.
Advancing medical and health technologies – collaboration between Singapore Institute of Technology and Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Finland
Already for the second time a workshop on the theme of advancing medical and health technologies in collaboration between Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and Metropolia University of Applied Sciences was organized in online-hybrid mode in Singapore on the 16th of August 2023. The workshop was opened by SIT Vice President Associate Professor Susanna Leong Su Jan who emphasized the importance of international collaboration in research and development in higher education institutions. The Ambassador of Finland in Singapore Antti Vänskä and Counselor for Education and Science Anna Korpi brought up similarities, strengths and challenges in Singaporean and Finnish societies, higher education and industry as well as the meaning and role of health technology in modern societies. Overall, the focus of the workshop was on the role of technology in healthcare education and applied research in education and industry. Speakers of the seminar comprised Singaporean and Finnish public and private sector companies, health care organizations and higher education institutions. Interesting speeches about health care innovations were delivered by Dr Mabel Yen Ngoc Nguyen, Co-Founder of Elocare Pte Ltd , Singapore, who spoke about Elocare’s mobile solution to manage menopause affecting women particularly in mid-life and Dr Darshan Kumar, Customer Success Manager, Aiforia (Finland) who shared about Aifora’s AI-based solutions for pathology image analysis. We also learned about modifying health through gut microbiome by Kaiyee Toh, Head, Laboratory and Research, AMILI, Singapore. The workshop also featured talks by Associate Professor Alfred Kow, Department of Surgery, and Dr Yujia Gao, Assistant Group Chief Technology Officer, both from the National University Hospital Singapore, who spoke about the need for liberalizing data flow by transforming data silos into a highly networked ecosystem and gave several use case scenarios on the use of AR/VR/AI for medical student education and staff training, which ultimately benefits patient care. Finnish health technology company representants CEO Jouni Ihme from Innomentarium and Corporate Key Account Executive Ossi Koskinen from Siemens Heatlhineers highlighted the importance of health technology companies working together with higher education institutions’ (HEI) students, professors and researchers. Citing CEO Jouni Ihme, “benefits of this kind of collaboration for health technology companies comprise having more resources such as HEI’s student’s and professors’ work participation for their research and development, access to HEI’s laboratory and other facilities needed for research and development as well as the scientific competence of HEIs for their use”. The benefits of collaboration for the universities and their students comprise access to future health technology and research, possibilities to widen networks via health technology companies and advanced funding possibilities with health technology companies. For the students, collaboration with health technology companies give the possibility to study solving real life problems which motivates studying, getting familiar with health technology industries, possibility for internships and even workplaces after graduation. Singapore and Finland are located far apart on the globe. However, with our previous collaboration since 2019, we have vastly similar outlook in vision and the important role of technology applied to the society. Principal Lecturer Eija Metsälä from Metropolia has previously stated, the text in the Finnish Act of the Universities of Applied Sciences about the pivotal role of Universities of Applied Sciences (932/2014) ‘’ to provide higher education for professional expert tasks and duties based on the requirements of the world of work and its development carry out applied research, development and innovation activities and artistic activities that serve education in universities of applied sciences, promote industry, business and regional development and regenerate the industrial structure of the region.’’ This is equally relevant to the Singaporean and global context. Authors Principal Lecturer, Docent Eija Metsälä, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Associate Professor Frank Guan, Singapore Institute of Technology Assistant Professor Cheryl Pei Ling Lian, Singapore Institute of Technology Associate Professor Cheow Wean Sin, Singapore Institute of Technology