Generative AI models like ChatGPT and Midjourney are capable of producing creative text and images faster than humans. So, why do we still need poets if ChatGPT can generate as many poems as one could ever request? And what about illustrators? Midjourney can produce stunning images even in the hands of an amateur prompt writer. Is it really the case that human creativity can be replaced by machines?
What is Creativity?
The relationship between human and computer creativity has been studied for a long time. Even long before the era of ChatGPT, researchers were developing AI models that could generate stories, music, and images. This field of study is called computational creativity. The interplay between human and machine creativity has long captivated researchers in this domain.
Boden is one of the theorists in computational creativity. According to her, creativity can be divided into two categories: exploratory creativity and transformational creativity. This distinction is crucial when we aim to understand the limits of computational creativity.
Artificial Intelligence Exploring Creative Possibilities
Currently, all major AI models are capable of exploratory creativity. This means that AI models operate within a defined creative search space, exploring the possibilities within it. For example, if we consider an image made up of 512×512 pixels, where each pixel must represent one of a predetermined set of colors from a color palette, it is clear that the number of possible images is finite. An AI model capable of exploratory creativity can thus generate images only within these rules — these rules define and limit the creative search space.
The situation is even more constrained in reality. No generative AI model can produce all possible images that could exist in a 512×512 size. AI’s functionality is also limited by the data it has been trained on. If you ask an AI for an image of a panda, it will not generate all possible panda images, but only those that align with the understanding of a panda it has learned from the data.
In creativity, boundaries are made to be broken
Exploratory creativity is clearly confined to a specific search space. But what kind of creativity is shackled by limitations? After all, boundaries are made to be broken! Boundary-breaking creativity is transformational creativity, as it transforms the boundaries of the search space itself.
If I am given an A4 sheet of paper and tasked with drawing a house, my creativity is confined to creating a two-dimensional image. As a human, I can pick up the paper and fold it into a house — this is transformational creativity, as I have altered the search space. The third dimension enables the creation of entirely different houses from the A4 paper compared to the original two-dimensional sheet.
AI is not yet capable of breaking boundaries. None of the popular AI tools can transform their search space and decide, for example, that instead of creating an image with pixels, they will paint it with a brush. Nor can they spontaneously try a new style that hasn’t been taught to them in the training data.
The role of humans remains essential
AI can produce impressive and creative outputs, but it remains bound by its patterns. The creativity of AI stays within the constraints of its task and training data, and it cannot generate anything beyond the frameworks it has been given.
This does not mean that AI is not creative or that it is inherently poor at creative tasks. It simply means that its creativity has not yet reached the level of human creativity. Therefore, there will still be a need for human creativity in the future, at least until we develop a categorically different kind of AI.
Comments
No comments